LIGHT THE COMPLETE SPECTRUM!
PLEASE NOTE: The XXX and the XXX are identical mind machines except
for labeling and the color of the goggles that come standard with each unit.
From here on out, all references to the XXX can be inferred for the XXX
system.
To dispense the pulsing stimuli, TONES generated by a mind machine are administered
to the auditory canal via headphones. Light Emitting Diodes (LED) or incandescent
bulbs mounted on the inside lenses of Oakley style sunglasses deliver the
photons to the cornea-lens-retina-optic nerve-optic chiasma-optic tract-lateral
geniculate nucleus-whose fibers carry the information through the internal
capsule and the corona radiata to the primary visual cortex in the banks
of the calcarine sulcus which is part of the occipital lobe of the human
brain. Whew! The bulbs consist of basically two varieties. White incandescent
bulbs are used in the products made by XXX and various colored LEDs are
used in every other manufacturers glasses. So the first question that arises
is which is better and why?
The research literature is very clear on which colors are the most entraining,
stimulating, annoying, and which are the most relaxing. However, the literature
is vague concerning the different characteristics of light produced by LED
diodes versus incandescent bulbs. To study this dilemma, the glasses that
come with the various mind machines were evaluated by 30 graduate and undergraduate
students for the following CHARACTERISTICS:
·LIGHT COLOR
·LIGHT DISPERSION - Concentrated vs. Evenly Dispersed (due to Diode
and/or Bulb Placement)
·LIGHT PATTERNS and VISUAL IMAGERY produced
·EYES OPEN VISUALIZATION
·COMFORT/FIT
For each category, ratings were based on a scale of 0 (worst) to 5 (best).
0 Unacceptable
1 Poor
2 Below Average
3 Average
4 Good
5 Excellent
Each CATEGORY was graded taking into consideration the following qualities
and how important each quality was to the research subject's experience:
RELAXATION & COMFORT, ENTERTAINMENT, STIMULATION, and ANNOYANCE. There
was a tendency for the stimulating glasses to be more annoying and disturbing
for some individuals when used at the same light intensity as the relaxing
glasses. Similarly, rapid frequency changes and phase modulations inherent
in some of the resident programs along with a narrow pulse width (i.e.,
XXX), while very entertaining for some research subjects, tended to disrupt
the hypnagogic experience for others who described these characteristics
as disturbing and unpleasant.
The fit of the various glasses were also graded using the same scale of
0 to 5. Sub-categories such as comfort and adjustability, the quality of
construction including durability, materials, quality of workmanship, and
any defects (e.g., asymmetry) were also considered in arriving at a test
score decision.
Each research subject had the liberty to test all the mind machines with
their respective glasses to her/his satisfaction before their scheduled
grading session. All glasses were set to the same light intensity of approximately
1400 Lux at 0 cm from the light source except for XXX and XXX which could
not reach this intensity. These units were set to their maximum brightness
of 958 Lux. Immediately before testing, each research subject experienced
each pair of glasses several times in sessions lasting over 20 minutes before
specific GRADING was begun.
Research subjects were asked to notice how relaxing, entertaining, stimulating,
and annoying each pair of glasses were in terms of color of light produced,
light dispersion due to the positioning of the light source, light patterns
and visual imagery produced, eyes open visualization, comfort and fit. Only
after a research subject experienced each pair of goggles several times
was specific questioning and grading begun. Not until a research subject
was satisfied that s/he had sufficient time to experience a pair of glasses
and accumulate enough data to come to a substantiated conclusion did the
research director move on to the next question or next pair of glasses to
be reviewed.
Individual comments were recorded on micro-cassette per the students own
bursts of insight, comment, and opinion. Since individual tastes vary, the
comments are unique. However, there are general trends.
Copyright 1996 Neuro-Technology Research. All rights are reserved under
International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions including the right
of reproduction in whole or in part in any form.